Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: Rhythmbox library stuff
- From: Martin Jeppesen <d2xdt2 gmail com>
- To: jrl ids org au
- Cc: Rhythmbox-devel list <rhythmbox-devel gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [Rhythmbox-devel] Re: Rhythmbox library stuff
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:50:37 +0100
The last email lost the CC to the mailinglist.
> All the patch does is automatically create some auto playlists as child
> sources of the library. Actually having two (or more) separate libraries
> is very different from what it does.
Yes okay, what I ment was, that adding Auto Playlists could be adding
using the Sources context menu. =)
> I don't think that having "real" multiple libraries is a good idea,
> because it will make other things a *lot* more complicated. In particular,
> much of the design of Rhythmbox is based on the assumption that there is
> one library. Trying to change that assumption would mean that things like
> the import dialogs, playlists et cetera, would need to have options to
> specify which library there are acting on.
For what purphase was the patch made? I mean, was it ment to solve the
multi library request, or does Auto Playlists have other benefits?
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]