Re: Looking forward: 2.16 plans
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Looking forward: 2.16 plans
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:44:08 +0100
Le vendredi 10 mars 2006 �2:33 -0500, John (J5) Palmieri a �it :
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 21:24 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As 2.14.0 is out next week, it'd be nice to start working on the 2.16
> > schedule. Any volunteer for this?
>
> * J5 raises hand
Cool :-)
I guess a good first step is to take the schedule for 2.13/2.14 and add
6 months everywhere. You can already create a wiki page for it.
> > Also, we should really start discussing what we're doing wrt to the way
> > we handle new modules and big changes in 2.16. I liked Jeff's proposal:
> > ask people to make the plans clear at the beginning of the release cycle
> > and start working with those plans in head (it means, start really
> > integrating the new modules early and start using new versions of
> > libraries early, etc.).
> >
> > What do you think? Should someone write a proposal to submit it to the
> > community?
>
> Yes I like the idea of getting modules to be considered at the beginning
> of the cycle, giving them deadlines and seeing if they can meet them.
> Call it the gauntlet - if you can survive you are worthy ;-) I can
> write up a proposal. What are the key points we want to make?
Great! I don't know what other think, but key points are, IMHO:
+ have to propose the module/announce the big change before the
2.15.1 release. This will enable everyone to have a good vision
of the potential important changes in 2.16.
+ push for integration wherever possible in 2.15.1 and 2.15.2
=> people proposing new modules or big changes should not wait that
others do the integration work
+ finish most of the work for 2.15.3. Community will try to reach
a consensus before the 2.15.4 release, based on the experience of
using 2.15.3.
+ when faced to a decision after 2.15.4, we will *really* consider
the most conservative choice
=> "if you want to change something big, do it as early as possible"
(deadlines can of course be changed to make more sense)
This is not such a big change when you look at what we had before.
However, it makes our position clearer: we should be aggressive when
doing changes so that they're done (and known) early in the release
cycle.
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press�
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]