Re: libglade releases

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 12:38 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I notice that there is still no libglade 2.6.0 release, leaving the
> latest release looking a bit unstable with a 2.5.x version. libglade
> generally matches the GTK+ version number, so we'd ideally have a
> libglade 2.8.0 release for GNOME 2.14.
> 
> I think the release-team should be prepare to roll this release if James
> doesn't get around to it. I haven't had much luck asking James to do it:

Please please please. How hard can this be?

> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 08:52 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 13:44 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > > James, there don't seem to be changes in cvs to justify libglade 2.7
> > > releases, but I notice that we still don't even have a libglade 2.6.0
> > > release for GNOME 2.10. Could you release at least 2.6.0 please? I think
> > > I had to remind you about this for libglade 2.4.0 as well.
> > 
> > James, could we have some kind of .0 release, please?
> > 
-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com