Re: Minutes of the meeting (2006-07-31)
- From: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- To: release-team gnome org
- Subject: Re: Minutes of the meeting (2006-07-31)
- Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:10:02 +0200
Hi,
Thanks for the minutes. Here are some comments.
On lun, 2006-07-31 at 18:54 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Accepting gtk# apps in the desktop:
> ===================================
>
> Obviously a hot topic, much like evolution and epiphany/galeon from
> previous releases. No choice will make everyone happy (not even
> everyone on the release-team) but most of us agreed that the
> following middle ground seems to be the best representation of
> community consensus that we are able to find:
>
> New modules may be accepted into the desktop or admin releases
> with a dependency on gtk#/mono, but any modules accepted into
> either of those release sets without a dependency on gtk#/mono may
> not gain one without going through the proposal process again in a
> subsequent release.
(For the record, I'm still not fond of this)
Shouldn't we replace gtk#/mono with "a binding"? This should probably be
true for other bindings too (except maybe python because we all love
python ;-)).
> New module decisions:
> =====================
>
> + orca, alacarte, g-p-m already decided (IN) at 2006-07-21 meeting[1]
>
> + gtk#
> => we agreed at the previous meeting that there was positive
> consensus, but there was a strong concern about wrapping of
> unstable API/ABI
> => agreement that Mike's recent split proposal[2] sounds sane
> => disappointment expressed about gtk# bindings to gnome-vfs not
> being in the bindings suite, but the issue not considered a
> blocker
> => IN, if Mike's split goes through (wrappers for platform modules
> in bindings suite, wrappers for desktop libs in desktop suite)
I'd suggest removing the details of the IN since it might sound that
we're pushing for the gnome-vfs bindings to be in the bindings suite and
there's a link to Mike's mail for the details: "IN, if Mike's split goes
through"
Thanks!
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas press�
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]