Re: Translations not used in Evolution (was Re: Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched)
- From: Harish Krishnaswamy <kharish novell com>
- To: Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>
- Cc: evo-hackers <evolution-hackers gnome org>, release-team <release-team gnome org>, Roozbeh Pournader <roozbeh farsiweb info>, gnome-doc <gnome-doc-list gnome org>, gnome-i18n <gnome-i18n gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Translations not used in Evolution (was Re: Evolution and Evolution-Data-Server branched)
- Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 18:33:49 +0530
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 13:00 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> On Mon, September 19, 2005 10:24, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote:
> > However, it would be helpful if you could make incremental updates
> > during the development cycle  or have all your huge changes
> > committed at least a day prior to the deadline. This would limit the
> > damage caused by errors in packaging or missing commits.
> While I agree that your first solution would be nice, some translators
> don't do this because it's really hard to keep translating the modules
> when there's no string freeze. So they only translate when string
> freeze is here.
> I suggest you release the module on the Monday of the release (as
> requested by the release team).
Yes. I have been doing so - it is to adhere to this deadline that I
need to cut-off commits much earlier to allow testing and QA
verification [Yes, we now have an array of written test cases and a
dedicated team that runs them, regresses fixes etc. for nearly a full
> Translators know that if they
> commit their translations on Monday, it might already be too late
> for their translations to go in the release. But if you need to
> make the tarball for the release before Monday, then send an e-mail
> to gnome-i18n so translators know that the tarball will be made
> before Monday.
This sounds fine. It is almost always the Friday before the due-date,
but I can post a heads-up to gnome-i18n in future.
] [Thread Prev