Re: GTK+ API freeze and bindings
- From: Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>
- To: Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>
- Cc: gnome-release-team <release-team gnome org>, Vincent Untz <vuntz gnome org>, "language-bindings gnome org" <language-bindings gnome org>, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: GTK+ API freeze and bindings
- Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:45:34 -0600
On 7/15/05, Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com> wrote:
> On 7/15/05, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 13:01 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 15 juillet 2005 à 12:20 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > > > GTK+ is now mostly API frozen and GNOME is in official API/ABI freeze.
> > > > But GTK+ might add one or two bits of API. I think language-bindings
> > > > should be allowed to wrap those new things quickly if it's simple (r-t
> > > > members should speak up if they object).
I agree.
> > > Did we come to a consensus regarding GTK+ 2.8?
> >
> > I think yes, while asking people to be cautious.
>
> Agreed, though if Elijah is running HEAD, I'd love to hear his impression.
Due to disappearing off the face of the planet for a while
(http://www.gnome.org/~newren/blog/2005/Jul/03), I've only been
running HEAD for about 2-3 weeks and haven't really stress tested it,
though I have run using it for all my daily work during that time and
it's been solid for me. I am aware of two issues as related to WM
interaction, but neither provide a regression relative to the Gnome
2.10/gtk+ 2.6 combo and both require Metacity fixes first anyway. So,
I also agree with Murray.
Elijah
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]