Re: Freeze break request: Some API additions

[Luis Villa <luis villa gmail com>]

Murray, is there anyone else appropriate on the team right now to
approve this? Everything seems in place, but I'm clearly not the right
one to be giving a thumbs up/down on this...
Luis


On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 00:39:13 +0100, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:34 +0100, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 00:21 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >
> > > > Of course, all of the above will be tested as part of our test suites.
> > >
> > > Which of these can not wait for 2.11/12?
> >
> > Well, *technically* they could all wait for the next cycle.  But it
> > would be really tragic if our users weren't able to use those methods
> > for half a year just because we were blind or the lacked the time to
> > implement them.
> >
> > > These additions will not disturb existing applications, but I worry
> > > that you don't have time to check that the API is correct before it's
> > > really frozen.
> >
> > I think that's unfounded because we have tests (included in the patches)
> > for every change that ensure that they all do exactly what they're
> > supposed to do.
> 
> You can never be sure that you've tested everything, but that's far more
> than I expected, so here's 1 of 2 approvals. Thanks for being careful.
> 
> --
> Murray Cumming
> murrayc murrayc com
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> release-team mailing list
> release-team gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team
>