Re: API documentation requirements for next releases



On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 21:04 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote:

> I agree that it's a good thing, I was just worried that there'd be an
> uproar when the official requirement looked like it didn't match the
> proposal people tacitly agreed to.  The response, however, looked
> fairly tame (with only Daniel commenting something along the lines of
> the process looking broken yet saying he was willing to do it anyway),
> so it looks like my worries may have been unfounded.

Those Frenchmen... :)

> Thanks for pushing this and putting up with my nitpicking and worrying,

Bah, no problem.  I'll nitpick you until you fix the "windows appear
behind maximized windows" bug in metacity ;)

  Federico




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]