Hi! El vie, 27-02-2004 a las 16:14, Richard Hult escribió: > fre 2004-02-27 klockan 16.02 skrev Kurt Maute: > > On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 15:08, Richard Hult wrote: > > > tor 2004-02-26 klockan 16.23 skrev Kurt Maute: > > > > > > > > Is this another setup issue, or is the new gda engine not compatible > > > > with the old database setup? > > > > > > Hm, which version of libgda do you have? > > > > > > /Richard > > > > > I'm using: > > libgda-1.0.2-1 > > libgda-devel-1.0.2-1 > > Alvaro, do you know if we are perhaps using something that's not > available in 1.0.x? If so, maybe we should fix it since 1.1.x is the > development branch if I recall correctly. > Sorry for the long, long answer to the question. I am sure we haven't used something specific from libgda 1.1 because I haven't it installed ;-) My libgda packages from debian sid are now: acs freebook:~$ dpkg -l | grep libgda ii libgda-common 0.2.96-6 GNOME Data Access library -- common files ii libgda0 0.2.96-6 GNOME Data Access library -- runtime librari ii libgda2-1 1.0.3-2 GNOME Data Access library for GNOME2 ii libgda2-common 1.0.3-2 Common files for GNOME Data Access library f ii libgda2-dev 1.0.3-2 Development files for GNOME Data Access libr ii libgda2-doc 1.0.3-2 Documentation files for GNOME Data Access li Cheers > /Richard
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente