Re: [Planner Dev] Bugs in the undo system: Report to reach 0.12

[Richard Hult <richard imendio com>]

On fre, 2004-06-25 at 08:24 +0100, lincoln phipps openmutual net wrote:
> 
> Alvaro del Castillo wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Hmmm, what I am doing is when you remove a property, save all data from
> > this property (GValues) to a hash table. In the hash table I use the
> > MrpTask o MrpResource as the key and the data is the GValue for the
> > property. If you undo the property removal then you add the property
> > another time and set all the tasks or resources to the GValues they had.
> > 
> > Do you find some prob with this approach? I am very near to finish it
> > adn we can test it.
> > 
> 
> 
> No that sounds perfect ! - Alvaro, you're a better coder than I !.
> 
> With, Undo names are inconsistent,
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144742
> 
> what do we plan for the actual text strings ?. Wouldn't it
> be nice to have some convention so as to make life easier
> for the translators ?.
> 
> e.g. just make it 3 words,
> 
> "Action" "Thing" "Attribute"

That would be a nightmare for translators as many languages don't work
that way, as in you can't just take three words a put them together. You
need the full sentence to be able to to a proper translation.

/Richard

-- 
Imendio HB, http://www.imendio.com/