[Planner Dev] lag & more

[Andrej Vodopivec <Andrej Vodopivec ids si>]

On Thu Jul 29 02:32:30 CEST 2004, Richard Hult wrote:
> On ons, 2004-07-28 at 19:46 -0400, Kurt Maute wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 12:50, lincoln.phipps at openmutual.net wrote:
> > > Andrej Vodopivec wrote:
> > > > The single thing that stands out is predecessor lag time.
> > > > User guide says:
> > > > "Finally, you can enter a lag time for the relationship, which
> > > > represents the
> > > > number of days after the relationship has been satisfied."
> > >
> > > Thats not right ! and its actually hours and not days; when you add
> > > a link and set the lag then the value you add into the dialog is
> > > actually an hourly figure, though its stored in the memory/xml
> > > as a usual planner time i.e. in  seconds (1 in the dialog stored as 3600)
> >
> > Interesting.  I'm not sure how that one got by me, considering that I
> > remember discussing the issue of lag time being in hours more than once
> > on this list in the past.
> >
> > I'll update the user guide.
>
> Hm, it's probably better to fix the code for the next release.

Guys, I will read about CVS, try to follow Lincoln intructions on
coding, and fix the (bug?) whis week but I still do not know whether
the unit entred by user is in work days (as to the current calendar)
which makes a lot of sense to me (even though the only unit in
projects I plan is a week so elapsed weeks would be better).

Regards
Andrej