Re: Memory statistics

[michael meeks <michael meeks novell com>]

On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:09 +0200, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> And given that .got, .data and other writable sections are together,
> and you're 99.999999% (maybe even 100%, I don't know)
> guaranteed to have at least one write somewhere, you're bound to have
> at least one dirty page per library per process.

	Of course, as previously discussed; linking uses the GOT - so, assuming
your shlib either uses other libraries, or exports symbols - and you are
not prelinked, you certainly get to dirty at least one page of the GOT.

> /me finds it rather amusing, in a sad way, that desktop developers
> again have to discuss such things. Welcome to the club :-/

	:-)

		Michael.

-- 
 michael meeks novell com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot