Re: Is the ORBit2 stubs/skels breakage unacceptable?

[Frederic Crozat <fcrozat mandrakesoft com>]

Le dim 29/06/2003 à 15:53, Jeff Waugh a écrit :
> <quote who="James Henstridge">
> 
> > If a machine has orbit2 headers installed, then it also has orbit-idl, so
> > any arguments about including the generated files for the benefit of
> > people without orbit-idl don't really stand up.
> > 
> > If any source tarballs are including generated stubs, then they should
> > definitely be fixed.  The fix is to not include the generated files,
> > rather than to include newer versions of generated files.
> 
> Great, thanks for that explanation. Marco was right in saying that this
> should be documented a bit better, because it seems that *lots* of tarballs
> include the generated files (there is a massive amount of breakage in my
> current GARNOME tree). Time to report bugs, then. :-)

I have to agree with that.. I already found some problems with evolution
1.4.0.. Let's see this as a new bug discovering feature of 2.3.x :))

-- 
Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@mandrakesoft.com>
Mandrakesoft