Re: GEP / C++ bindings ...

Hi Guys,

On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 10:12, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> On 15 Aug 2002, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > 	I'm curious as to what has been done at the expense of a separate
> > project - my feeling is that it wouldn't be _that_ hard to split out
> > some or all of the C++ stuff.
> do you have someone to do this split-out?
> I'm going to work on finishing what we currently have (there are some
> things lacking in sequence<enum> and union code), but no matter how easy
> it is going to be to separate it into a standalone library, there will
> still need to be someone to do it.

	Drat; incidentally I (foolishly) made gnome-components-list the forum
for whether we should merge in the C++ bindings instead of orbit-list -
which sucks; I'll update the GEP and try to get people to cross-post

	Either way - if you're missing the discussion it's over there.



--  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]