Re: ORBit2 and linc - licensing?
- From: Jon Trowbridge <trow ximian com>
- To: Sander Vesik <Sander Vesik Sun COM>
- Cc: Matthew Copeland <matthewc designlab ukans edu>, orbit-list gnome org, matthew copeland honeywell com, Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>, gnome-2-0-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: ORBit2 and linc - licensing?
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 18:37:18 -0400
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 10:53:24PM +0100, Sander Vesik wrote:
>
> Well... if you really wanted to get an answer in this or any other matter,
> you would go to your (company's) lawyers and ask them. Is FSF qualified to
> give legal advice?
>
Sure, but:
* I've heard of several cases of company lawyers looking at the GPL and
coming up with some pretty surreal[1] interpretations of it. I'm sure
that Sun has some lawyers who understand the GPL quite well, but
that isn't going to be true of any random company. (Remember, 20% of all
lawyers graduated in the bottom fifth of their law school class.)
* RMS is not a lawyer (RMSINAL?), but his knowledge of the law surrounding
the GPL is extremely impressive. And in my experience, he will promptly
and carefully respond to pretty much any question --- as long as it isn't
"can I get around the GPL if I do X?", of course. :-)
-JT
[1] Here I'm using "surreal" as a polite term for "stupidly,
obviously, blindingly wrong".
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]