R: CORBA_sequence_CORBA_long__allocbuf

["Samuele Gallazzi" <samuele gallazzi tin it>]

Hi,
finally I solved my problems: the function is
CORBA_sequence_CORBA_long_allocbuf() and not
CORBA_sequence_CORBA_long__allocbuf()... maybe someone else is interested to
our thread...

I have to thank you a lot for your tips!!
But my doubts never end...
I defined another sequence in idl: a sequence of a struct. Can I manage it
with _legth and _buffer as the long made sequence? Is it the same thing?

thanks... for your patience
Samuele


-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: orbit-list-admin@gnome.org [mailto:orbit-list-admin@gnome.org]Per
conto di Michael Meeks
Inviato: mercoledì 11 luglio 2001 15.24
A: orbit-list@gnome.org
Oggetto: Re: CORBA_sequence_CORBA_long__allocbuf



Hi Samuele,

        It looks very much as if you have forgotten to include listaDisp.h
- or at least, the errors are inconsistant:

> 123.   servant->attr_dispID._buffer =
> dispList_list__allocbuf(servant->attr_dispID._length+1);

> listaDisp.o: In function `impl_dispList_addDisp':
> listaDisp.o(.text+0x1c2): undefined reference to
`dispList_list__allocbuff'

        This is not possible - somewhere there is a type 'allocbuf' is
correct 'allocbuff' is not.

> that seems not to recognize the ...__allocbuf as a function, but it
> has correcly been declared by the orbit-idl in the -common.c file.
> Why? What happens??

        Both of these methods are probably #defines that do not exist as
methods, you need to include the generated header.

        Regards,

		Michael.

--
 mmeeks@gnu.org  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


_______________________________________________
orbit-list mailing list
orbit-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orbit-list