Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
- From: Jamie Lokier <lk tantalophile demon co uk>
- To: Alexander Viro <viro math psu edu>
- Cc: Chris Lattner <sabre nondot org>, "Mohammad A. Haque" <mhaque haque net>, Ben Ford <ben kalifornia com>, linux-kernel vger kernel org, orbit-list gnome org, korbit-cvs lists sourceforge net
- Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit
- Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 17:34:56 +0100
Alexander Viro wrote:
> > Err... how about this: Give me two or three kORBit syscalls and I can get
> > rid of all the other 100+ syscalls! :)
>
> Like it ioctl() does it? Number of entry points is _not_ an issue. Diversity
> of the API is. Technically, kernel has 1 (_o_n_e_) entry point as far as
> userland is concerned. int 0x80 on x86. Can't beat that, can you?
If there's one thing that could be nicer, ioctl() would be it.
ioctl() works ok in C and terribly in everything else.
CORBA works well in scripting languages and Java, and sucks in C
compared with a simple ioctl().
Is there a way to marry the best sides of each?
Is 9P that way (I don't know much about it)?
-- Jamie
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]