Re: Ethereal comparison 1.265 vs 1.270 DHCP Discover
- From: Bill Moss <bmoss clemson edu>
- To: networkmanager list <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Ethereal comparison 1.265 vs 1.270 DHCP Discover
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:07:49 -0500
I think older hardware may reject messages that are too short. The UDP
part of the message contains a BOOTP section of options and there was a
time when BOOTP messages had a minimize size of 300 bytes. If this is
what the SMC is doing, the a message with a UDP part of 297 bytes will
not pass muster. This is just a guess. I suppose you can pad the message
one byte at a time and see where the boundary is. I am betting on 300 or
312.
--
Bill Moss
Professor, Mathematical Sciences
Clemson University
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]