Ethereal comparison 1.265 vs 1.270 DHCP Discover
- From: Bill Moss <bmoss clemson edu>
- To: networkmanager list <networkmanager-list gnome org>
- Subject: Ethereal comparison 1.265 vs 1.270 DHCP Discover
- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 16:02:04 -0500
Bootstrap Protocol identical down to
1.270:
Option 53 DHCP Message TYPE = DHCP Discover
Option 57: Maximum DHCP Message Size = 548
Option 51: IP Address Lease Time = infinity
Option 55: Parameter Request List
Option 12: Host Name = "localhost.localdomain"
== SMC DHCP does not send an ARP. It is stuck here. It doesn't like
something about the way this message is constructed. All checksums are
correct in all parts of the message.
1.265
Option 53 DHCP Message TYPE = DHCP Discover
Option 57: Maximum DHCP Message Size = 548
Option 51: IP Address Lease Time = infinity
Option 55: Parameter Request List
Option 60: Vendor class identifier = "Linux 2.6.10-1.760_FC3 i686"
Option 61: Client identifier
== SMC DHCP immcdiately sends an ARP and the process continues to completion
--
Bill Moss
Professor, Mathematical Sciences
Clemson University
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]