Re: CVS version crashes on start
- From: Nico <lordllucifer gmail com>
- To: networkmanager-list gnome org, Thomas Graf <tgraf suug ch>
- Cc:
- Subject: Re: CVS version crashes on start
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:50:27 +0100
On 12/7/05, Robert Love <rml novell com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-07 at 18:51 +0100, Nico wrote:
>
> > sure.
> >
> > /Nico
> >
> > (gdb) run
> > Starting program: NetworkManager --no-daemon
> > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> > [New Thread -1211500864 (LWP 15555)]
> > NetworkManager: <information> starting...
> > *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x080a3ab8 ***
> >
> > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> > [Switching to Thread -1211500864 (LWP 15555)]
> > 0xb7cc9027 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > (gdb) backtrace
> > #0 0xb7cc9027 in raise () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #1 0xb7cca747 in abort () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #2 0xb7cfc5c9 in __libc_message () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #3 0xb7d05026 in malloc_printerr () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #4 0xb7d03d0d in _int_free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #5 0xb7d02a7b in free () from /lib/tls/libc.so.6
> > #6 0xb7f6c40d in nlmsg_free (n=0x80a1180) at msg.c:517
> > #7 0xb7f6d9bc in nl_recvmsgs (handle=0x808bf30, cb=0x80a1228) at nl.c:703
> > #8 0xb7f6a317 in nl_cache_update (handle=0x808bf30, cache=0x80a1d28)
> > at cache.c:414
> > #9 0xb7f74ccb in rtnl_link_alloc_cache (handle=0x808bf30) at route/link.c:656
> > #10 0x08066706 in get_link_cache ()
> > #11 0x08066907 in iface_to_rtnl_link ()
> > #12 0x080672ba in nm_system_device_set_up_down_with_iface ()
> > #13 0x080671f3 in nm_system_device_set_up_down ()
> > #14 0x08059c46 in nm_device_set_up_down ()
> > #15 0x08059eca in nm_device_bring_up ()
> > #16 0x08059f11 in nm_device_bring_up_wait ()
> > #17 0x08056f6e in nm_device_new ()
> > #18 0x080613bd in nm_create_device_and_add_to_list ()
> > #19 0x08061ad3 in nm_add_initial_devices ()
> > #20 0x08062ddf in nm_hal_init ()
> > #21 0x080634dc in main ()
> > (gdb)
>
> Looks like a libnl bug?
>
> Thomas?
>
> Robert Love
>
>
>
Yup, it was.. it works fine now after yesterdays commits to the libnl svn.
thanks,
Nico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]