On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 10:49 -0500, Daniel Gryniewicz wrote: > How about something smaller and faster than bind, such as dnsmasq? I used BIND because most OSes ship it. I'm open to investigation of other alternatives such as dnsmasq, maradns, etc. In particular I'm interested in DNS servers which provide a shared library for running them in-process. But I'd rather focus on getting the rest of the architecture working than replacing what currently exists in order to just e.g. save a bit of memory.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part