Am Montag, den 03.10.2005, 21:16 +0200 schrieb Diego Gonzalez: > On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 14:55 +0200, Christian Neumair wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 10.04.2005, 14:18 +0200 schrieb Diego Gonzalez: > > > Is there any reason to keep all the nautilus metadata related > > > functionality using Bonobo. > > > Can i remove the bonobo use from those objets and turn them normal > > > GObjects? > > > > > > I have been looking at it and this is what i will try: > > > 1) Remove all the bonobo usage from nautilus-metafile.c and > > > nautilus-metafile-factory.c > > > 2) Remove all the monitor classes related to metadata and convert > > > the NautilusMetafile to emit signals instead > > > 3) Remove nautilus-directory-metafile and adapt all the classes to > > > call directly the nautilus_metafile methods. > > > > > > I think i can have this working in a couple of weeks if there is > > > interest in it. > > > > Any news? :). Would be nice to have this for Nautilus 2.14. > > Hi > > From the last conversations I understood that someone was working on a > replacement for the bonobo based metadata server and that he would try > to integrate it, that's why i didn't try to go any further along this > road. Yes, this is right. I'm quiet optimistic that Jamie comes up with a good solution for metadata indexing. His architectural considerations are well-founded. This implementation will definitly not use NautilusMetafile, though. > I don't expect > having enough time to have this ready for Nautilus 2.14. Thanks for your quick feedback and good luck with your master thesis and further bug fixing! On a related sidenote: I'm already having a debonobozation patch in my local repsitory that needs a little love, but does not radically change the metadata architecture - just to let others know that this work gets already done. -- Christian Neumair <chris gnome-de org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part