Oh, Dialog 1 could use radio buttons instead of check boxes: ( ) Try to log in without a password ( ) Log in with a user account Username: [ ] Password: [ ] to correctly denote to the user that each operation is mutually exclusive. El jue, 20-05-2004 a las 09:24, Laszlo Kovacs escribió: > Hi All, > > Calum was kind enough to put together a proposal for going ahead. > > It is all here: > > http://www.gnome.org/~calum/usability/specs/ftp-login/ > > This needs changes in gnome-vfs (I have some of this code already) and > in gnome-keyring. > > There are a couple of things to think about: > > 1. With dialog2 we are proposing that the user will see the > authentication dialog coming back until they log in successfully or > press cancel. This is different from what we have now. Right now if the > authentication fails there is a warning dialog and that's it. The > proposal provides a better user experience. I am not sure yet where this > change needs to be made. It would be ideal if all vfs modules that > require authentication would nehave like this, but I think every module > would need to be changed separately for that. > > 2. We are also proposing to change the authentication dialog for the ftp > protocol only, for other protocols it will stay as it is. > > 3. If the uri contained a username the username field in the > authentication dialog (implemented in gnome-keyring) is not editable. I > think the reasoning behind this is that if the user wants a different > username or no username at all then they need to create a new launcher. > This is quite inflexible in general and creates a complication for this > situation as well. If we follow this thinking then if the user used > anonymous for the username in the uri then the tickbox should be ticked > in the dialog and the user should not be able to untick it. If we don't > do this then we don't have a consistent behaviour, however having a tick > box that can not be unticked is not good at all. Any suggestions > (particularly from the gnome-keyring maintainer) are welcome. I > personally think it might be good to make that username field always > editable again. > > Any thoughts about this? > > Thanks, > > Laszlo -- Manuel Amador (Rudd-O) GPG key ID: 0xC1033CAD at keyserver.net
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente