Re: [RFC/PATCH] inotify -- a dnotify replacement

On Mon, 10 May 2004 18:17:40 -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> I now use ino_t and dev_t , though in struct inode, i_no is unsigned
> long?

Correct.  That definition should be changed as well, I just didn't
care enough to submit a patch yet.  Anyway, old mistakes never justify
new mistakes.


People will accept your ideas much more readily if you tell them
that Benjamin Franklin said it first.
-- unknown

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]