Re: Undo: Still relevant?

[Olaf Frączyk <olaf cbk poznan pl>]

On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 06:08, Alan wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 11:07:59AM -0600, Ryan McDougall wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-21-07 at 17:48 +0100, Calum Benson wrote:
> > > Christian Neumair wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Is it planned to reimplement undo support? What actions ought to be
> > > > undoable, anyway?
> > > 
> > > Move, copy, delete and rename spring immediately to mind.
> > 
> > delete->"Move to Trash"? so to undo that would be like MS's restore from
> > trash command? 
> 
> I think so, or even an edit->undo last [move|delete|rename] option,
> which would do basically the same thing.
I think it is too much. If I do undo, I want to undo last action. It
shouldn't be needed to specify what action. If I want to undo last 5
steps I don't want to be forced to having to remember in what order the
move/delete... were applied. I think that most users would be confused.
Additionally, I suppose we will have 1 keyboard shortcut (Ctrl^Z).

Regards,

Olaf