Re: FEATURE: Icon Resource in application binaries
- From: Ionut Cotoi <cotty cotty iren ro>
- To: Nautilus Development List <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: FEATURE: Icon Resource in application binaries
- Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2004 23:33:49 +0300
Usualy this "read" permission accompanies the exec bit.
Ionut Cotoi
Junior Developer
ITC Networks Romania
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 12:50, Olaf Frączyk wrote:
On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 22:56, Ionut Cotoi wrote:
> Hey, we don't want to make things THAT UNIVERSAL... nobody said
> that....
> We can put away the part with the scripts (even though it is not that
> hard), there is no such thing on any other platform either (not that
> we shouldn't come up with something original from time to time), but
> embedding something at link-time in to the elf header that can be
> afterwords read by a file manager, it's not hard.
> I think that we should focus on what would be cleaner to implement for
> the elf executable format, and Linux in particular.
I think you all miss one important thing.
With you resolution you require that the "read" permission is set.
You don't need _read_ permission to execute a binary. The only bit which
is needed is _execute_.
About putting icons in EAs. You need to check what limitations are for
size of a single EA and all EAs per directory entry. And what about
filesystems without EAs then?
Regards,
Olaf
[Date Prev][
Date Next] [Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]