Re: [RFC][PATCH] inotify 0.8.1 [u]

[John McCutchan <ttb tentacle dhs org>]

On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 15:44, Martin Schlemmer [c] wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 06:32, John McCutchan wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> > I am resubmitting inotify for comments and review. Inotify has
> > changed drastically from the earlier proposal that Al Viro did not
> > approve of. There is no longer any use of (device number, inode number)
> > pairs. Please give this version of inotify a fresh view.
> > 
> 
> I applied this to 2.6.8.1 and most of -mm4's patches - it applied
> cleanly and compiled fine.
> 
> I use devicemapper to stripe two 80gb sata drives on intel sata
> controller, using initramfs.
> 
> Now when I boot, I see something like:
> 
> ---
> BIOS EDD facility v0.16 2004-Jun-25, 2 devices found
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 264k freed
> inotify device opened
> dm ioctl error or such
> ---
> Which then results in a panic as the dm volumes cannot be setup
> and no / found by kernel.  So basically it seems like inotify
> mess with dm in some way or other - any quick ideas what it
> could be?
> 

This is very strange. 'inotify device opened' is printed when an app
opens /dev/inotify. Do you have code that is doing that? I am wondering
if inotify's MAJOR/MINOR is getting confused with device mappers. I
don't know how it could be happening since /dev/inotify has the kernel
assign it an available minor number, and its major number is the major
number for all misc char devices.

> I do not have serial console, so if you need a more complete log,
> just let me know from where abouts I should start, and if any
> debugging should be turned on, etc.

Could you find out what the major/minor numbers are on /dev/inotify and
whatever dev device mapper has?

Thanks for testing.

John