Re: double-click on scripts behaviour



Hi,

The freedesktop shared mime database (from CVS) supports a sub-class-of
tag which can be used to do exactly that as far as I understood:
 sub-class-of elements indicate that any data of this
type is also some other type, given by the type
attribute. 

Christophe

> This highlights one of my major problems with the current MIME database
> (something that I'll get around to discussing on that list one of these
> days): many documents can/should have multiple MIME types.  These MIME
> types are frequently hierarchical in nature, e.g. an SVG image has the
> registered "most specific" MIME type of image/svg+xml, however
> application/xml and arguably text/xml both also apply.  RFC 3023
> addresses this specific issue by using the magic '+xml' suffix and
> declares that XML is the first 'generic format' that requires this
> special treatment.  That is absolutely incorrect.  I can think of one
> other format that is used in a similar fashion: zip.  At the moment Java
> archives ('.jar') and OpenOffice.org documents ('.sxi', etc.) are both
> zip files with a prescribed structure.  Should their MIME types be
> application/x-oowriter+zip? More (potentially) controversial are
> applications like AbiWord that support gzipped file formats (.abw or
> .abwz files).  Is one file format application/x-abiword+xml and the
> other application/x-abiword+gz? AbiWord is capable of opening both, but
> it isn't capable of opening a generic gzip.
> 
> Currently, the 'sniffed' MIME type is the definitive one and is also
> likely to be the incorrect one.  Sniffing a .abwz file tells us it's a
> gzip, just like a .tar.gz, however AbiWord cannot open tarballs and File
> Roller has no idea what to do with an AbiWord document (well, it can
> decompress it, but that's not likely what you wanted to do with it).
> 
> My first reaction to your post was to say that the use of 'application/'
> was misplaced, however, doing a little research seems to indicate that
> it is indeed correct, but at the same time, very broken.  All of a
> sudden the text editor I've registered to handle text/* must be
> associated with every single programming language I use because the
> scripts are considered 'applications' rather than 'text'.  That's absurd
> and yet, apparently, correct.
> -- 
> Shahms King <shahms shahms com>
> 
> -- 
> nautilus-list mailing list
> nautilus-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]