Re: patches for configure.in and nautilus.spec{.in}

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On 12 Mar 2003, Neil Weisenfeld wrote:

> I don't know from the discussion on desktop-devel if people are 
> amenable to getting these patches, but here goes.
> 
> I'm also an autotools newbie, so I'm not sure if I did this right, but
> the problems seem straightforward.  
> 
> Patches attached (let me know if requiring 'patch -p1' is non-standard).

Please use unified diffs. In general i tell people to add "diff -up" to 
their .cvsrc, which gives very nice patches.
 
> This is my first attempt at this stuff, so let me know if this is
> helpful or not.

Sure, this looks good. Do you want to own the specfile? Both maintainers 
already own the specfiles for their company (rh/ximian), so we're utterly 
uninterested in maintaining another one.

> - now includes gconf schema (is there supposed to be a *registration*
> process here or is it enough just install the file?)

Yes. See e.g. the redhat nautilus srpm how to do this.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a lonely drug-addicted messiah fleeing from a secret government 
programme. She's an orphaned antique-collecting cab driver in the wrong place 
at the wrong time. They fight crime!