Re: Regarding Nautilus scripts
- From: Ross Burton <r burton 180sw com>
- To: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Regarding Nautilus scripts
- Date: 10 Jun 2003 11:07:55 +0100
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 01:52, Eugenia Loli-Queru wrote:
> > So how is this more difficult than MacOS or BeOS?
> You have to deal with 2 files instead of one. The .server file is
> completely reduntant from the user's point of view. You might think "the
> user won't mess with those", but this is untrue. From the moment an
> applet/extension/addon thingie takes off (with the trick of installing 4-5
> of them by default), users will fall in love with the functionality.
[snip yadda yadda]
Joe user will either install a pre-build package, or take a source
tarball and do the configure && make && make install.
Via either route, the exact files used and locations of files are not
known. The user installs a package, Stuff Just Works. The user runs
"make install" in a tarball, everything is installed, Stuff Just Works.
Nobody expects the user to manually install the .server and .so file, as
that thinking means that we also expect them to compile C code manually
without using Makefiles.
Ross
--
Ross Burton Software Engineer
OneEighty Software Ltd Tel: +44 20 8680 8712
Cygnet House Fax: +44 20 8680 8453
12-14 Sydenham Road r burton 180sw com
Croydon, Surrey CR9 2ET, UK http://www.180sw.com./
====================================================================
Under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers (RIP) Act 2000 together
with any and all Regulations in force pursuant to the Act OneEighty
Software Ltd reserves the right to monitor any or all incoming or
outgoing communications as provided for under the Act
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]