RE: shift=and-close-the-current-folder?
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- Cc: shaunm gnome org, "nautilus-list gnome org" <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: RE: shift=and-close-the-current-folder?
- Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 14:00:23 +0000
On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 13:41, Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> I don't know what it's like for accessibility needs, but I always found Mac
> keyboard navigation wonderful, though it was mostly just direct accelerators
> and keys for dialog buttons. I hardly ever used the mouse.
It's certainly a lot better in OSX, but if you were forced to use the
keyboard in earlier releases, there were quite a few corners you
couldn't even paint yourself into, let alone out of again :)
> > Which begs an equally important
> > question of whether it's popular because people want to use
> > it, or because they have to due to a lack of mouse equivalents.
>
> No, the mouse equivalents are there.
Right, I really meant "efficient mouse equivalents" :) Of course there
can't be efficient mouse equivalents for everything, but for a desktop
that was designed from day one to be primarily used with the mouse, and
in which the file manager is probably the major component, it strikes me
as a bit of an anomaly that you should have to resort to the keyboard to
use it reasonably efficiently.
> I look forward to a day when we can remove the terminal from GNOME and let
> other people worry about that.
Amen to that :)
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com GNOME Desktop Group
http://ie.sun.com +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]