Re: Medusa branch in Nautilus
- From: "Curtis C. Hovey" <sinzui cox net>
- To: Nautilus-list <nautilus-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Medusa branch in Nautilus
- Date: 06 Aug 2003 18:48:05 -0400
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 02:29, Aschwin van der Woude wrote:
> Great plans!
> Although an integration of search ala Evolution would be great too.
Yeah it wont be completed soon without help. A vfs-module is called for
as well as a door into evo, but it can be done.
> I have always wondered if medusa could replace the 'locate' tool .As I
> understand it they do the same thing, although medusa is way more
> powerful.
> Are my thoughts correct, could medusa have a locate-frontend as well?
> This would be great, the system wouldn't need to index my filesystem
> multiple times.
It already has msearch, a command line utility that beats the snot out
of find, grep, and locate. But Medusa is a user app now, not a system
app. One thought is to have build an index as nobody, and Medusa will
search the user and the systems db and present the results.
> When reading your plans with Medusa I realised Gnome is once again
> moving faster than some other parts of the system, adding features that
> would actually belong in the file-system. But since there is no defacto
> standard amount of features for Linux-filesystems other than standard
> posix, it is great to see Gnome add those features to its applications
> any way. I am talking about emblems, meta-data and now a proper indexer.
I agree that the filesystem should do most of the work. MS's Longhorn
will do what Medusa is doing because they control the filesystem. We
don't have such an option in a heterogeneous world of *nix. Medusa
should take advantage of smart filesystems when it can.
--
__C U R T I S C. H O V E Y____________________
sinzui cox net
Guilty of stealing everything I am.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]