On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 17:48, Seth Nickell wrote: > On Tue, 2002-01-22 at 12:02, Ben FrantzDale wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-01-21 at 14:05, Darin Adler wrote: > > > On 1/20/02 5:03 AM, "Seth Nickell" <snickell stanford edu> wrote: > > > > > > > Tigert & Jimmac have been busy and have at long last finished a > > > > replacement set for the original GMC stock icons we still use for (most) > > > > document type icons in Nautilus. I'd like to replace most of the > > > > document icons with the new document icons. > > > > > > > > See: http://primates.ximian.com/~tigert/new_stock_project/ > > > > > > > > Almost with exception I prefer the new document icons to the old gmc > > > > icons. However, there are some issues raised about possibly replacing a > > > > few of the newer "eazel" icons such as i-spreadsheet.png and i-music.png > > > > with generic versions that are consistent with the new document icons. > > > > (I don't have generic icons for these yet, only specific versions for > > > > Gnumeric, but I suspect that they would be pretty easy to create). > > > > > > Which theme are we talking about here? > > > > > > > 1) Is it OK if I replace the gnome-*.png icons in nautilus/icons with > > > > the new document icons? > > > > > > Sure. > > > > I'm curious, how large are the icons you guys made? I thought, to be > > viewable at 400% and full quality, icons need to be 194x194 pixels. > > All Tuomas' current icons except for regular and music are at the > "normal" size. He's willing to do a number of the more common ones in a > range of sizes, so I'm making up a list of the more important/common > document types that should have multiple sizes done. I'd be interested in helping make large versions of icons if people want help. --Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part