[Nautilus-list] Re: [GNOME VFS] start-here: etc. vfs method
- From: Ian McKellar <yakk eavel com>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-vfs ximian com, nautilus-list eazel com
- Subject: [Nautilus-list] Re: [GNOME VFS] start-here: etc. vfs method
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:15:28 -0700
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 03:27:29PM -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a bit overdue, my apologies. Anyhow, the patch is appended,
> against stable branch, though clearly it needs merging to HEAD as
> well.
>
>
> Index: modules/Makefile.am
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gnome-vfs/modules/Makefile.am,v
> retrieving revision 1.67.2.3
> diff -u -p -u -r1.67.2.3 Makefile.am
> --- modules/Makefile.am 2001/09/19 19:13:35 1.67.2.3
> +++ modules/Makefile.am 2001/09/20 19:29:00
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ INCLUDES = \
>
> EXTRA_DIST = \
> default-modules.conf \
> + desktop-module.conf \
> cdda-module.conf \
(snip)
> -modulesconf_DATA = default-modules.conf $(CDDA_CONF) $(SSL_CONF)
> +modulesconf_DATA = default-modules.conf desktop-module.conf $(CDDA_CONF) $(SSL_CONF)
>
Why do you have a separate conf file for this? Is it nececary?
>
> Index: modules/desktop-method.c
> ===================================================================
(snip)
> +
> +#define G_N_ELEMENTS(arr) (sizeof (arr) / sizeof ((arr)[0]))
Is this macro going to be in GLib2? If its not part of a glib I would
rather it not have it use the G_ prefix.
Other than that it looks good. Do you think you'll have a chance to make a
patch against HEAD too?
Thanks,
Ian
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]