Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: IMON in mainstream Linux kernel?
- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs noisehavoc org>
- To: Ian McKellar <yakk-nautilus yakk net au>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Yoann Vandoorselaere <yoann mandrakesoft com>, Darin Adler <darin bentspoon com>, nautilus-list lists eazel com, law sgi com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: IMON in mainstream Linux kernel?
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:52:06 -0700
On 14Jun2001 12:23PM (+0800), Ian McKellar wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 02:48:10PM -0400, Alex Larsson wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Ian McKellar wrote:
> >
> > > The Linux 2.4 dnotify API is much much simpler than FAM. It simply tells you
> > > if something in a monitored directory has changed.
> >
> > It also fails if there are multiple hard links to a file, and you're
> > watching it in a directory other than the one it is changed in.
> >
> > Al Viro had various other complaints about it's semantics too.
>
> And worst of all, it uses SIGIO!!!!
>
> Which means we'll need to write an external monitoring process that sends
> events to a fd :-(
>
Despite the lame semantics, I think it would make the most sense to
try to make FAM support it, rather than writing a new and different
daemon process.
Regards,
Maciej
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]