Re: [Nautilus-list] first time druid
- From: Evan DiBiase <evand wplug org>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: nautilus-list eazel com
- Subject: Re: [Nautilus-list] first time druid
- Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 22:52:29 -0400 (EDT)
On 7 Jul 2001, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Discovered that I didn't successfully eliminate all the Eazel Services
> stuff from the first time druid.
>
> Of the remaining pages, here are my views:
> - user level page: maybe interesting, but I think
> the menu is obvious enough, especially for anyone who actually
> is advanced
> - gmc transition: Nautilus should simply understand .desktop files,
> in fact it does and I'm hacking on a patch to do it better,
> so I don't think we should convert to nautilus link files.
> (actually since .desktop files are somewhat standardized,
> I think we should deprecate nautilus link files)
> - two eazel services pages should clearly go
> - proxy configuration might be nice
>
> Is it worth having a druid that's just user level + proxy config?
> Or should we delete it entirely?
>
> I'd really tend toward removing the druid entirely, on the grounds
> that if we have anything we should have a GNOME-wide first time druid
> along the lines of the gnome-upgrade.py in Red Hat or doorman in
> Ximian.
>
> Opinions?
I love the idea of having just one first-time druid for GNOME (the
KDE2.2 betas have a nice thing along these lines), but we should
probably decide on some sort of project-wide solution rather than
leaving it up to Red Hat or Ximian. I'm thinking of myself here, frankly
-- I use Debian, which uses the stock GNOME packages; they lack any sort
of functionality along these lines. If the druid is to be removed from
Nautilus, it would be my hope that it would only be when a suitable
GNOME-standard first-time one was in place.
-Evan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]