Re: [Nautilus-list] GNOME VFS & GConf



Fatih Demir <kabalak gmx net> writes:

> Darin Adler [ Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 09:43:38AM -0700 ] : 
> > > Shouldn't gnome-vfs also use GConf HEAD/>=0.9 now?
> > 
> > It does. Note the gnome-vfs.spec.in that says GConf >= 0.9 and the
> > configure.in that says AM_PATH_GCONF(0.9.0...).
> 
> Good to know :-)
> 
> > > There are really only 2 places where one have got to
> > > change the source. Now what about this ? I could do
> > > it, but eazel.com's HACKING files are too fine :-)
> > >
> > > It's only applying to gnome-vfs-mime-handlers.c.
> > 
> > Not sure what problem you're having. I've built gnome-vfs with HEAD gconf
> > for the last few days.
> 
> I do use GConf HEAD ( 0.10 ) and i do still get the errors.
> It's the gconf_engine_new(); call in gnome-vfs-mime-handlers.c;
> As far as my eyes don't lie GConf now uses gconf_engine_get_default()
>  do get the default engine; I had to do it also for libgtranslator, so
>   I guess it's now gconf_engine_get_default().

Have you a branch of gnome-vfs ?

        1) make sure you have cvs updated correctly.
        2) cat CVS/Tag ---> should report something. mail it to me.

Mathieu

> 
> -- 
> kabalak / kabalak gmx net / Fatih Demir
> `-GNOME / ICQ:64241161
>  `-Filemanager / VFU & vim
> `-Editor / vim & Source Navigator
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nautilus-list mailing list
> Nautilus-list lists eazel com
> http://www.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list

-- 
Mathieu Lacage <mathieu eazel com>





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]