Re: [Muine] MonoConventions

[Jorn Baayen <jbaayen gnome org>]

Seems a bit odd to me, but if this is the new standard, I won't
complain. Patches welcome. :)

Jorn

On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 13:27 -0700, Link Dupont wrote:

> Based off a discussion I've been having with Mirco (the Debian gtk-sharp
> maintainer), I would like to propose conforming the Muine install
> locations to the MonoConventions. Currently, code is placed in /usr/lib,
> which has traditionally been for architecture dependent libraries. Most
> Mono applications are not architecture dependent, and therefore
> shouldn't be placed in /usr/lib (to be FHS compliant). Debian has
> written up an alternate scheme for its packaging[1] that seems to me to
> be a bit more logical.
> Does this format jive with anyone? Is this worth spending time doing?
> 
> 1: http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?MonoConventions
> -- 
> Link Dupont <link subpop net>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> muine-list mailing list
> muine-list gnome org
> http://lists.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/muine-list