Re: constraints_experiments is ready

[Elijah Newren <newren gmail com>]

On 11/17/05, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com> wrote:
> I agree the effect is the same ;-)
>
> All I'm saying is that to me window->rect.x is never the position of the
> frame window, conceptually. It does happen to map to that for the moment
> in time your comment applies to, but just because we interpret the
> window's current position as a configure request with NorthWestGravity
> at that moment in time, and NorthWestGravity configure requests mean
> "treat the requested x,y as the NW corner of the frame window"

Ah, I didn't mean that comment to be explaining what window->rect.x
means generally (I would have done that in window.h); I meant it to be
explaining what attrs->x would be used for in that function.  But
yeah, considering the confusion the comment needs to be clarified or
nuked.

I'll get to the changes specified when I can get some more time in the
next couple days.

Thanks,
Elijah