Re: [patch] const_cast to be replaced by str_unconst

[Roland Illig <roland illig gmx de>]

Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > For those of you that are concerned about the performance loss of an
> > extra function call: It is much more important for the code to be
> > readable and checkable by the compiler than to be 1 millisecond faster
> > at all.
>
> You can inline it.

When compiling with gcc using -Wcast-qual, this would give us a warning 
for every file. The non-inlined version would produce the warning only 
for one file, namely src/util.c.

I want as few warnings as possible.

Roland