RE: Proposed syntax for key sequences
- From: BARTHAZI Andras <andras barthazi hu>
- To: "'Pavel Roskin'" <proski gnu org>
- Cc: <mc-devel gnome org>
- Subject: RE: Proposed syntax for key sequences
- Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 09:39:30 +0100
Hello!
> Actually, we are interested in the sequences in the
> application keypad mode, so I was wrong. It makes the
> difference for xterm, but not for rxvt. Please try this
> command instead of dd:
>
> echo -ne '\e[?1h\e='; dd
Left: ^[OD
Ctrl-Left: ^[[D
Shift-Left: ^[OD
Alt-Left: ^[^[OD
> > Left: ^[[D
> > Ctrl-Left: ^[OD
> > Shift-Left: ^[[D
> > Alt-Left: ^[^[[D
> This is completely different from the Xterm Control Sequences
> specification: ^[[ (CSI) should be used in the normal mode and
> ^[O (SS3) in the application mode, regardless of modifiers.
> In fact, Ctrl-arrows on putty conflict with normal arrows on xterm,
> not with Shift-arrows as I wrote in the previous message.
As you write, not really, because there is a swith at putty's
configuration: "Initial state of cursor keys: Normal / Application". You
can set it as you want, the default is Normal. As I set it to
Application, the normal dd works as with the echo.
> I think the best thing you can do it to ask putty developers to
implement
> xterm specification for the arrow keys. You can even try it yourself.
It looks like, that they did it, and it works well, just not the
application mode the default.
> I'm not going to add any hacks to identify putty.
I totally agree, and we don't need it, too.
Summarizing above, it seems that putty is correct, but mc still not
works for me. :)
Bye,
Andras
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]