testing mc-devel GNOME ORG (fwd)

[Pavel Roskin <proski gnu org>]

Hi, Miguel!

The test looks good. Same for mc gnome org 

I'm a bit worried about using Mailman 2.0beta5 while the stable (and
newer) version 2.0.3 is available.

On the positive side, it took just minutes for the message to go through
the whole chain.

-- 
Regards,
Pavel Roskin

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Envelope-to: proski gnu org
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164]
	by localhost with IMAP (fetchmail-5.6.2)
	for proski localhost (single-drop); Fri, 27 Apr 2001 17:01:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from menu.gnome.org ([209.116.70.71] helo=mail.gnome.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
	id 14tFHE-0007ZA-00
	for <proski gnu org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:55:44 -0400
Received: from mail.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 271072BD2A; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:55:16 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: mc-devel gnome org
Received: from erandi.helixcode.com (erandi.ximian.com [141.154.95.33])
	by mail.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49E52BAB8
	for <mc-devel gnome org>; Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:50:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from miguel localhost)
	by erandi.helixcode.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA11752;
	Fri, 27 Apr 2001 16:48:55 -0400
To: mc-devel gnome org
Subject: testing mc-devel GNOME ORG
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel ximian com>
Date: 27 Apr 2001 16:48:55 -0400
Message-ID: <m3sniu9ih4 fsf erandi helixcode com>
Lines: 0
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5
Sender: mc-devel-admin gnome org
Errors-To: mc-devel-admin gnome org
X-BeenThere: mc-devel gnome org
X-Loop: mc-devel gnome org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta5
Precedence: bulk
List-Id:  <mc-devel.gnome.org>


_______________________________________________
Mc-devel mailing list
Mc-devel gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel