Re: [sigc] License (again)

[Aristid Breitkreuz <aribrei arcor de>]

Am Sonntag, den 12.02.2006, 15:54 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
> On Sun, 2006-02-12 at 14:43 +0100, Aristid Breitkreuz wrote:
> > Hi,
> > [snip: bid for MPL/GPL/LGPL-trilicense-compatible sigc++]
> 
> I don't consider this particularly urgent because the intent is made
> quite clear on the website. 

Oh, I'm just paranoid. :)

> 
> However, I'm likely to add a formal "exception" making it clear that the
> 10-line limit mentioned in the LGPL doesn't apply, so that people don't
> need to worry about code being inline just because it (must) be used via
> a template. This seems like the simplest thing to do.

Just like the libstdc++, which is GPL+Exception.

> 
> Suggestions for such an exception sentence are welcome.
> 
> Of course, we'll have to get permission from all the contributors. But
> that's probably possible.

Surely ;).

Thanks for the quick reply.