Re: Re: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.9.13 fails on Solaris 9 sparc
- From: martin-ml hippogriff de
- To: Damien Carbery <Damien Carbery Sun COM>
- Cc: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>, libsigc++ list <libsigc-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Re: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.9.13 fails on Solaris 9 sparc
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:09:49 +0100
Hi Damien!
Thanks for the new try. Obviously the patches I sent work and can be
checked into cvs. However, I won't get a chance to do this and look at
the new error until Thursday evening. (If somebody else wants to check
in the patches, don't overwrite adaptor_trait.h.m4. It is an outdated
version from libsigc++-1.9.14!)
Regards,
Martin
Am 16.03.2004 um 18:21 Uhr haben Sie geschrieben:
>
>
> Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Am 2004.03.15 20:03 schrieb(en) Murray Cumming:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:23, Damien Carbery wrote:
> >> > Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> > > On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 00:10, Martin Schulze wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >>Am 2004.03.04 17:22 schrieb(en) Damien Carbery:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>>Apologies for not doing this build earlier in the week.
Busy.
> >> > >>>I updated tests/test_mem_fun.cc and tests/test_ptr_fun.cc
and
> >> rebuilt
> >> > >>>(make clean; make).
> >> > >>>Log is attached.
> >> > >>
> >> > >>Please try again with the version of file
sigc++/adaptors/macros/
> >> > >>adaptor_trait.h.m4 that is attached to this email. The problem
is
> >> > >>the syntax for explicit method template specializations. gcc
> >> expects:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Martin, is all this stuff in cvs so far? I now have access to
a
> >> SUN
> >> > > Forte compiler, though it might not be the same as Damien
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]