Re: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.9.13 fails on Solaris 9 sparc

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 12:23, Damien Carbery wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 00:10, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > 
> >>Am 2004.03.04 17:22 schrieb(en) Damien Carbery:
> >>
> >>>Apologies for not doing this build earlier in the week. Busy.
> >>>I updated tests/test_mem_fun.cc and tests/test_ptr_fun.cc and rebuilt  
> >>>(make clean; make).
> >>>Log is attached.
> >>
> >>Please try again with the version of file sigc++/adaptors/macros/ 
> >>adaptor_trait.h.m4 that is attached to this email. The problem is
> >>the syntax for explicit method template specializations. gcc expects:
> > 
> > 
> > Martin, is all this stuff in cvs so far? I now have access to a SUN
> > Forte compiler, though it might not be the same as Damien's:
> > 
> > bash-2.03$ CC -V
> > CC: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 C++ 5.3 Patch 111685-11 2002/10/31
> > 
> > Damien, what does CC -V give you?
> > 
> 
> CC: Sun C++ 5.5 Patch 113817-03 2003/10/14
> It is from the Sun ONE Studio 8 Compiler Collection.
> http://wwws.sun.com/software/products/studio/index.html

Hmm, maybe 5.5 is much more capable than 5.3 - but I'd be happy if at
least one of them can build libsigc++ 2. I'm not sure at what point you
are, and exactly what sources you are both investigating - could someone
explain?

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc murrayc com