Re: [sigc] libsigc++ 1.9.13 fails on Solaris 9 sparc

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 12:02, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 10:35, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Am 2004.02.28 00:52 schrieb(en) Damien Carbery:
> > > Replaced test_functor_trait.cc. Compilation seemed to get by that
> > > file.
> > > Failed in test_mem_fun.c though.
> > 
> > I'm attaching new versions of test_mem_fun.cc and test_ptr_fun.cc
> > that should compile. Is there a macro that we can use to test
> > whether we are using the FORTE?
> 
> We have something like that in gtkmm. I'll check.

Well, ideally you would check for the specific compiler problem with a
little test case - for instance, glibmm checks for a strange Forte
reverse_iterator:
http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/glibmm/scripts/cxx_std.m4#79
That would let us use any future SUN Forte corrections without extra
work, and would help us with any other compilers with the same problem.

But libsigc++ 1.2 has a check for the SUN compiler that might still
work:
http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/sigc-root/base/scripts/sun.m4

-- 
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc murrayc com