Re: [libcroco-list] vendor specific declarations
- From: dodji seketeli org
- To: David A Knight <david ritter demon co uk>
- Cc: libcroco-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [libcroco-list] vendor specific declarations
- Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:18:50 +0100
Hi David,
I have commited a patch that provides the support for vendor
specific properties. I have actually created a new type of token (not
present in the CSS2 spec) called VENDOR_SPECIFIC_IDENT and modified the
parsing rules of the "property" production to make it accept
VENDOR_SPECIFIC_IDENT and IDENT tokens.
This seems to work and please, do not hesitate to report any error you may
encounter.
Thank you for raising this issue.
Regards,
Dodji.
Selon David A Knight <david ritter demon co uk>:
> On Tue, 2004-02-24 at 00:07 +0100, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
> > Hi David !
> >
> > I am sorry for my late reply. I was at the FOSDEM during the
> > week-end and I just came back.
> >
> > Well, I have thought about this when I
> > was implementing the parser, but as the CSS 2.0 specification didn't
> > formally defined the "vendor-specific" grammar, I decided not to
> > support in a first time. Now, it seems like someone needs it ;)
> > So here is what I propose: I will modify the parser so that any
> > token that has the pattern -IDENT (dash followed by an identifier)
> > gets recognized as an identifier.
> >
> > What do you think about this ? I will try to do this tomorrow night or
> > so and commit it.
>
> That would be great. I looked into doing that first by allowing - in
> nmstart but I couldn't sort it out.
>
>
>
> David
>
> --
> Make your website SCREEM - Site Creating & Editing EnvironMent
>
> URL: http://www.screem.org/
> Mail: david screem org
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]