Re: define-struct

[James Henstridge <james daa com au>]

Andrei Zmievski wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, James Henstridge wrote:
>
> > With the new defs format, I am mainly thinking about gtk 2.0.  With 2.0, 
> > GdkPixbuf is a GObject.
> >
> > For gdk-pixbuf-0.x releases (the current versions for use with gtk 1.2), 
> > it should fall under the boxed type category (the ref/unref functions 
> > correspond to the copy/free of a boxed type).  Unfortuately, it isn't 
> > registered with the typesystem as such :(
>
> I see. What about structs that are not registered as derivatives of
> G_TYPE_POINTER or GObject, but still need to be exposed? Are there any?
Not sure how best to handle that.  I usually treat it as a bug in the 
library I am trying to bind, and get the maintainer to fix it (adding a 
get_type() routine doesn't usually count as API breakage).

James.

--
Email: james daa com au
WWW:   http://www.daa.com.au/~james/