Re: [HIG] REVIEW - General Points
- From: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>
- To: hig gnome org
- Subject: Re: [HIG] REVIEW - General Points
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 13:33:06 +0100
Calum Benson wrote:
>
>
> - Title: "Mini Human Interface Guidelines" sounds like guidelines for
> mini humans...
>
> - Need a section on Feedback: when to use what sort of progress
> indicator, writing good error messages, correct use of status bar,
> cursor changes, sound, message boxes etc.
And another one... in my sections, I've currently got "recommended" and
"suggested" guidelines-- crap terminology, but the inference being that
some guidelines are more "important" to follow than others. Should we
go with this two (or more) level approach, and if so, what should we
call the two levels of guideline?
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson ireland sun com Desktop Engineering Group
http://www.sun.ie +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]