Re: [HIG] Naming
- From: Gregory Merchan <merchan phys lsu edu>
- To: hig gnome org
- Subject: Re: [HIG] Naming
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 12:41:09 -0600
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 10:24:28AM -0800, Adam Elman wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 03:52 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> >On 07Nov2001 03:58AM (-0600), Gregory Merchan wrote:
> >>
> >>As you may have guessed, I don't like Human Interface Guidelines
> >>because
> >>it isn't clear what the interface is between; put another way,
> >>"Interfacing with humans sounds like fun!" Perhaps more frightful -
> >>"Humans have interfaces? Do they accept RJ-45 connectors?"
> >>
> >
> >The complete title is GNOME Human Interface Guidelines. Therefore it's
> >about GNOME interfacing with humans.
>
> As I said before, I continue to believe that GNOME Human Interface
> Guidelines is the best title, and unless everybody else besides Maciej
> feels that this is too "Apple-like" for comfort, I would continue to
> stick with it.
I don't think it's too "Apple-like".
> All amusing jokes aside, the usability community tends to be pretty
> consistent in trying to include "human" as much as possible -- the field
> is called Human-Computer Interaction (or Computer-Human Interaction if
> you happen to be the ACM, but that's a whole 'nother rant :) Human
> Interface is an accurate description and very common terminology for
> what we're talking about. Every other way of stating it ("User
> Interface", "Usability", or just "Interface") has additional
> ramifications which at best I find uncomfortable and at worst I find
> unacceptable. If hackers don't understand the term "Human Interface,"
> (or, as Maciej noted, "GNOME Human Interface,") well, it's time for them
> to learn about it.
But, but, but . . . Well, nothing. The title is fine as it is.
> As Kathy said, "Standard" is way too strong for this, and "Style Guide"
> is too weak. So "Guidelines" is the right term. Hence, we are left
> with the current title, and so I vote for keeping it as is.
Next time, I'm writing "cum grano salis" with blink, emphasis, bold, large
fonts and garish colors.
I vote for keeping it as is.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]